Jump to content

Nighthawk

Member
  • Content Count

    3,464
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    Libertarian

Profile Fields

  • Website URL
    Abc@abc.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Anytown, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Still waiting on the answer to this question, pussy. This is now the FOURTH time I have asked. Good luck.
  2. I would only be "furious" in regards to the severe harm that will be inflicted upon the lowest-skilled workers, especially the black ones, as a result of such idiocy. Apparently you heartless bastard liberals just don't give a shit about who you hurt or how much they suffer, huh? So, you are like the racist liberal politicians in the 1930's that openly admitted they were pushing moronic MW laws to hurt black workers? Your definition of "improvement" is to put those uppity blacks in their place, right? I bet you racist libs have a good laugh about this at your clan rallies, huh? Lol...
  3. I proved it with the last part of the paragraph that you conveniently left out, dumbass. Here it is again for you- And we should also be seeing massive SHORTAGES of unskilled workers to fill all the massive number of new job openings from these new employers. For example, since almost all teenagers looking for work are looking for unskilled labor/MW jobs, if your dumb little fairy tale was true, then the unemployment rate for them should be essentially zero. Instead, we are usually seeing teenage unemployment rates that are consistently several times higher than the overall unemployment rate, especially for black teens, since the advent of moronic MW laws. So how do you reconcile that fact with your idiotic claim, moron? If you need me to provide you with links showing the significantly higher unemployment rates of teenagers, especially black teens, as a result of moronic MW law, just let me know.
  4. And of course that was wrong, but what the hell does it have to do with a single fucking thing I have posted??? What, you can't disprove any thing I have posted on the subject at hand, so you just try to randomly change the subject to something else? Lol...
  5. I never "pointed" to that labor percentage, dumbass. My point was to disprove your ignorant claim that employers of MW workers were making massive profits as a result of your claim that "only the severely disabled will have trouble providing even the most marginal of successful employers much more value than the current minimum wage", you fucking retard. But since you brought it up, even if you subtract out all the workers that would not see any increase from a higher MW, there still would not be enough money in profits for most companies that employ a large number of unskilled workers, like fast food restaurants, to pay the workers your precious $15/hr, idiot.
  6. No, you haven't "proven" any such thing, retard. All you have done is blindly claim it, with no proof whatsoever. And if their profits were truly as massive as you blindly claim, then you should be able to answer my questions or refute my arguments, instead of cowardly dodging them. Like this for example- But there are not hundreds and hundreds of new companies employing unskilled labor opening every single day, which is what should be happening if the profits were truly as GARGANTUAN as you are pretending above, dunce. And we should also be seeing massive SHORTAGES of unskilled workers to fill all the massive number of new job openings from these new employers. For example, since almost all teenagers looking for work are looking for unskilled labor/MW jobs, if your dumb little fairy tale was true, then the unemployment rate for them should be essentially zero. Instead, we are usually seeing teenage unemployment rates that are consistently several times higher than the overall unemployment rate, especially for black teens, since the advent of moronic MW laws. So how do you reconcile that fact with your idiotic claim, moron? Good luck.
  7. If I am really lying about something, then it should be extremely easy for you to show where I lied with proof, idiot. So what the fuck are you waiting for? Good luck. Where did I claim that people making a high salary would see an increase due to a change in moronic MW laws?!?!? And what the hell does this have to do with anything? What the hell are you babbling about? But there are not hundreds and hundreds of new companies employing unskilled labor opening every single day, which is what should be happening if the profits were truly as GARGANTUAN as you are pretending above, dunce. And we should also be seeing massive SHORTAGES of unskilled workers to fill all the massive number of new job openings from these new employers. For example, since almost all teenagers looking for work are looking for unskilled labor/MW jobs, if your dumb little fairy tale was true, then the unemployment rate for them should be essentially zero. Instead, we are usually seeing teenage unemployment rates that are consistently several times higher than the overall unemployment rate, especially for black teens, since the advent of moronic MW laws. So how do you reconcile that fact with your idiotic claim, moron? Oops, there goes your dumb little ignorant theory, yet again... I have already destroyed this idiotic theory earlier in this very thread, you damn retard. Again- just passing a moronic MW increase does not magically conjure extra wealth out of thin air, twit. If some people have more money to spend because of an increase in the MW, then this means that other people must simultaneously have LESS money to spend. And as I asked you above (with no answer as usual), if just putting money in the hands of poor people supposedly helps the economy so much then- Why the hell do you want to have moronic MW laws, when you could just directly give the poor money through tax credits, welfare, stimulus checks, etc..? These methods, even though they are also bad ideas, would be far more efficient, fairer, and less harmful than moronic MW laws, and would thus be the lesser of two evils, dunce. If you are going to do something stupid, why the hell at least not try to do it efficiently, fairly, and with the least amount of harm possible, moron? First of all, no, it has NOT "worked just fine", imbecile. It has caused tremendous harm to the lowest-skilled workers, especially the black ones, in making it difficult or impossible for many of them to get and/or maintain employment. Secondly, the harm has only been kept from being even worse during previous MW increases because inflation has served to reduce the harmful effects Damn, you somehow manage to make every single post of yours even dumber than the last one. Lol... For your information, dimwit, there was absolutely no moronic federal MW law whatsoever for the first roughly 150 years of this county's existence, and the US still managed to grow from a brand new country to a world superpower during this time. If the economy is not "growing like it used to" or we have "record debt and deficits", then this is not because of a lack of increasing moronic MW laws, dumbass.
  8. Damn you are stupid. A fast food restaurant doesn't have an "executive", dimwit. They have an "owner." The evil CEO of McDonald's corporation is not the owner and is not involved in running the day-to-day operations of every McDonald's restaurant, dullard. If this is supposedly true, then here is my simple question yet again- Why aren't there hundreds and hundreds of new fast food restaurants opening every single day by greedy people wanting to get rich? Are you claiming the country has suddenly run completely out of greedy people that want to easily get filthy rich? Lol... What the hell does that have to do with each individual restaurant, idiot? What, you think if there is an increase in the MW, each individual restaurant owner will just call up the corporate offices or the evil CEO and ask them to send them big piles of cash every week out of corporate profits so that they can give it to their workers to meet the higher wage requirements, and corporate will just happily oblige? Lol... Then it should be extremely easy to answer my simple questions, instead of repeatedly dodging them like a pussy. So what the fuck are you waiting for? Good luck.
  9. I will ask you this again, for the THIRD time now- What exactly do you think the term "equilibrium wage" means, dumbass? Can you answer this time, or will you cowardly dodge it again like a little pussy? Good luck.
  10. I didn't ask if there are "tons" of them, I very clearly asked you why there weren't hundreds and hundreds of new ones opening every day, dumbass. Why the hell would someone open any business other than one that employs these supposedly severely underpriced unskilled workers, such that they can very easily get filthy rich, twit? And why don't the actual profits in the real world for these kinds of businesses match your ignorant little fairy tale? Link1 Fast-food restaurants could not pay this additional amount out of their profits. The typical restaurant has a profit margin of just 3 percent before taxes.[4] Link2 Even if the talking point was true, and large corporations were mostly responsible for the country’s minimum wage workforce, organized labor’s math still wouldn’t make sense. Profit margins are determined more by the business model than the size. According to Deloitte’s Restaurant Industry Operations Report, the median profit margin at an independently owned fast-food restaurant is 2.6%—and only about a percentage point more at a corporately-owned location. Wait a second!?!?! I am now confused by this data that doesn't match your moronic claims! I thought that you said these unskilled workers were supposedly providing "employers much more value than the current minimum wage"??? So why the hell aren't these businesses employing them absolutely swimming in GARGANTUAN profits, you damn retard? Oops, there goes your dumb little ignorant theory... Do you really never get tired of me humiliating you so easily, moron? Lol...
  11. If your claim is true, then anyone employing a lot of unskilled laborers, like fast food restaurants, should be making GARGANTUAN profits and thus easily getting filthy rich. So why aren't there hundreds and hundreds of new fast food restaurants opening every single day by greedy people wanting to get rich? Are you claiming the country has suddenly run completely out of greedy people that want to easily get filthy rich? Lol...
  12. No, all moronic MW laws should be completely abolished and I know it. So what should we do with the people that can't currently provide value to an employer equal to the wage level you like, dimwit? Just tell them "too fucking bad, loser", as they sit home unemployed? What exactly do you think the term "equilibrium wage" means, dumbass?
  13. Are you claiming that there is no place in the country that has ever had a MW of $7.25 with a significantly high unemployment rate among teenagers, especially black teenagers, dumbass? And even if your claim is correct, so the fuck what? How would that disprove anything I have posted, idiot?
  14. Of course they are fluid. So the fuck what??? Why does any of that matter, moron? The chart is simply illustrating how when a moronic MW is set above the equilibrium wage, it will result in unemployment, dumbass. For example- if the equilibrium wage for some region, time period, type of work or worker, etc.. is say, $5/hr, then setting a MW at $10/hr will result in unemployment among people doing that type of work in that region, in that time period, etc.. Why is this so difficult for you to comprehend??? Again, this chart is something that you will find in any reputable book on basic economics and yet here you are- claiming it is supposedly a "prop", like some kind of ignorant fucking retard. Have you never taken a class on economics? Have you ever so much as even opened a book on basic economics once in your entire life? You should try it sometime. You might actually find that wallowing in gross ignorance and abject stupidity is not nearly as much fun as you currently think it is. Again, citing your job duties or proclaiming expertise alone are NOT arguments. If you really have expertise on a subject, then let it show through your arguments or by actually refuting my arguments, idiot. If you really "understand these concepts and their interplay", then prove it for fuck's sake. Instead, you are just cowardly dodging most of the arguments I am making or the simple questions I am asking (some of them over and over and over and over). I can play the same game as you by citing and posting quotes from world-renowned and award winning economists that agree with my positions, if that is what you think matters on a subject. Are you saying that just seeing these quotes will cause you to admit you are wrong and change your mind? If not, then why do you think that I would do that just because you claim expertise, dimwit? What the hell am I suppose to "listen" to, dullard? The examples you use where you just pull bullshit numbers out of your ass? Make an argument or answer a damn question, twit. Lol... Where have you supposedly done this? By just blindly claiming my chart (which can be found in any reputable economics textbook) is supposedly "BS"? Or how about in the post above when you completely ignored this utter destruction of your idiotic claim- "I am not just talking about one business, I am talking about a group of businesses, which is why there was an "s" at the end of the word "owners" in my question, fool. Yes, if all the employees of the other businesses all choose to come spend their extra money at my store only, and all of my own employees did the same thing, then I would make more profit as a result. No fucking duh. But I would be making this extra profit at the expense of all the other businesses since they would all be worse off as a result. The point is, the combined extra profit of all of these businesses put together will not be any higher as a result of a moronic MW law, moron." Why did you ignore this? Because you are a sniveling little coward? Because you know you can't refute it? Of course it wouldn't "pose a threat" to most business owners, dolt. Business owners in general are not the ones that are hurt by moronic MW laws. The people that are hurt the most are the lowest-skilled workers, especially the black ones. I know I must have explained this to your ignorant ass at least half a dozen times already. How many more times will it take before it sinks through your incredibly thick skull??? So you are admitting defeat and cowardly running away like a scared little pussy? If so, welcome to the club. You are just one of dozens and dozens of idiot libs that I have completely destroyed and humiliated until they run away with their tails between their legs. Don't worry, I will be sure to be bumping this thread numerous times so everyone can see your cowardice...
×
×
  • Create New...