Jump to content

WillFranklin

Teachers pets
  • Content Count

    36,451
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WillFranklin

  1. I want to make it clear that as a member of this "team" I am not to be trolled in Debate. So I take it to the unwashed masses.
  2. I want to teach you guys about real Debate. So sorry I won't quit as moderator. But no posting in Debate for me right now. So long as I don't POST in Debate I am not at their mercy since they allow trolling.
  3. Getting ready to fire this one off.
  4. Then the message would be "Sorry guys I am too low on the totem pole to stop the trolling by conservatives."
  5. I am thinking of how to phrase this to the unwashed masses. "Not Posting In Debate Room Because It Sucks Due To Trolling" is my TEAM PLAYER thread title for NHB, right @Chuck! ???
  6. A thread is in order to explain why I am no longer willing to post in the Debate forum that I assist in moderating.
  7. I was trolled. That is not allowed. It was to distract the conversation and deny me the privilege of simply proceeding using the only presented example. Hell no I won't post there.
  8. Using your comments to distract and deny one member the privilege of referring to the only presented example in the discussion is trolling. It is nonsense as well. That could not be more clear. You want him to troll.
  9. Nonsense. I interact with more detail with the other posters than you do tenfold. And I have the sense to know a troll and their trolling. You want to allow it in Debate.
  10. I will now announce my decision verbatim.
  11. So there we have it. I moderate Debate. I just don't post in Debate until my superiors figure out what Debate is. They have no experience. I have to simply teach them slowly as moderator so I do not suffer at their hand.
  12. By your stated definition I was. It was presented as if I had no right to refer to the only example presented to me by my opponent, which is upsetting, and only meant to derail the conversation. So if that is what you want to allow conservative trolls to do then have at it without me posting in your bullshit room.. I will moderate it. But I won't dare post in that bullshit room.
  13. I should not be trolled for referring to the only example presented to me by my opponent. If that is your idea of Clean Debate then I want no part of that. I breathed some life into that room today. I am not willing to do that tomorrow.
  14. But people already know this site is basically 75% conservative trolls.
  15. But if you insist I will start a thread in Debate called "Ignore kking's special troll named Duck615" ... and even pin it if you like....
  16. Your advice is to ignore the troll. Do you realize that? Read yourself. I want a Clean Debate Room.
  17. I like how you show us all that you only read one post and not the entire conversation. But yes, that post is lambasting me for referring to my opponent's ONLY presented example. That's trolling, Cletus. How else can I Debate without using the only example presented by my opponent? You are missing teeth I suppose.
  18. Let me repeat. If you idiots just want Duck to come jack off all over these Debate threads every time I refer to someone's cherry-picked example then I am not posting in Debate.
  19. And anyone with two cents worth of Debate experience would understand what I am pointing out. But if you want Duck to just come jack off all over these threads every time I refer to someone's example I am not posting there.
  20. And anyone with two cents worth of Debate experience would understand what I am pointing out. But if you want Duck to just come jack off all over these threads every time I refer to someone's example I am not posting here.
  21. No. He was not allowing me to proceed and refer to the same and only example his teammate had introduced which is simply obstructing my turn in the Debate.
  22. It is trolling to lambaste someone on the other team for simply referring to the same example your teammate posed. There is no other reference point for the debater to refer to. How can Debate proceed?
  23. Then it is trolling because it is upsetting to a member to not be permitted to refer to the same example their opponent raised without being lambasted from the opposition's team member simply for referring to the same example, which is your only reference point in the conversation. And the lambasting steers things off-topic. Do you even understand what I am trying to explain? I need a confirmation that you at least comprehend.
  24. Trolling is not limited to swearing and personal insults. Trolling is: Member A says consider a single mother with two children and so on. Member B says consider your example of a single mother with two children. Member C on team with Member A says you are wrong for even referring to the example. That is not Clean Debate. That is nonsense. That is trolling. You like it because a conservative did it I guess.
  25. So this is going to be a fun vacation while I consider my future here.
×
×
  • Create New...