Jump to content

WillFranklin

Moderator
  • Content Count

    34,627
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About WillFranklin

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    Democrat

Profile Fields

  • Website URL
    none

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    North Carolina
  • Interests
    Bowling

Recent Profile Visitors

15,906 profile views
  1. Trump suppresses witness testimony. Bolton has offered to testify under subpoena, but Trump last week strongly suggested he'd fight that move, arguing that Bolton's testimony would create "a national security problem." With that in mind, the White House is reportedly weighing plans to invoke executive privilege to block Bolton's appearance if the Senate votes to call him in. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/480306-democrats-say-trump-ceded-right-to-block-bolton-when-he-attacked-him
  2. Chuck! was fired for lying, among other things. And lies like his implication that I have ever hidden anything of his are the reason.
  3. More of the truth will convince the Senate as well, which is where the trial actually stakes place. The House was already convinced. When did Trump *not* suppress witness testimony? It started with Stormy Daniels in another case. The impeachment witnesses are the most I have ever seen Trump suppress. I started a whole thread about it. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/480306-democrats-say-trump-ceded-right-to-block-bolton-when-he-attacked-him Bolton has offered to testify under subpoena, but Trump last week strongly suggested he'd fight that move, arguing that Bolton's testimony would create "a national security problem." With that in mind, the White House is reportedly weighing plans to invoke executive privilege to block Bolton's appearance if the Senate votes to call him in.
  4. Fifteen news outlets reported it on the front page. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/25/us/politics/mcgahn-testimony-ruling.html https://www.npr.org/2019/11/25/782705643/federal-judge-rules-that-mcgahn-must-testify-delivering-blow-to-white-house There is just another two. Prove me wrong. Else you lose. Judge was U.S. District Court Judge Kentanji Brown Jackson...
  5. The ruling, which you should know about, states that the House committee subpoenas are valid.
  6. They proved their case, but we now know more about what we claimed when Trump suppressed witness testimony. So more of the truth needs to be heard. You have so much Trump corruption to hide. It must be frustrating for you. You have no justification for your Trump witness suppression and intimidation other than to cover up wrongdoing. The case must be proven for the Senate now anyway, not the House. And there are new witnesses coming forward.
  7. The ruling stands. Trump is the one going for defeat. It is even getting harder and harder for him to suppress witness testimony. You are arguing for suppression of facts.
  8. I did not agree that the original case had not been proven. There is more information that was hidden that needs to be uncovered. That is what I said. You are a proven idiot again. And you have no integrity as you cover up corruption in the name of your political party. Party over Country.
×
×
  • Create New...