Skans

What you said was stupid and unsupported. The "lame" response you received from me was all your response deserved. Support what you said, and perhaps you would receive a less lame response.

Homes do not feel love. People do. Democrats seem to have a problem attributing feelings to inanimate objects. Weird.

I am not blaming others for my shortcomings. I am opposing the political positions and beliefs of 4 Congresswomen who have decided to work in lockstep with each other. Do you really not know the difference? Are you just trying out a new "debate strategy" by trying to make this personal, rather than debating the political issues presented? It does seem like this is all Democrats have left - and your positions tend to reinforce my belief that you cannot defend the actions and rhetoric of the Hateful-4.

Not so. You might want this to be so, but it is not. If Bernie Sanders was taking the same position as Omar, we would attack him. I have attacked Biden and many other male Democrats. You just need to understand, we hate Democrats. Male or Female. Black or white. If you are a Democrat, then we Conservatives and Republicans hate you because of what you want and what you believe. We don't care about your skin or your genitalia. We hate the very essence of who and what you are - your core beliefs.

You can keep saying that. But, as usual, you are simply dead-wrong. The Supreme Court said there is an individual right. So does the 2nd Amendment.

I don't know if I ever expressed hate toward Hillary Clinton on any personal level. I do hate her political positions as I think she is far too Socialist. I hate what she wold do as President of this Country. I have made fun of her ineptness and have mentioned Podesta's comments about her foul odor in his emails. Do you really see any problem with that? And, what does this have to do with my comments about the Hateful-4?

I don't think they would have laughed. There was a lot of wrangling going on leading up to the drafting of the 2nd Amendment. This is all detailed in the Federalist Letters. Here is just one excerpt from James Madison on the discussing the right of the people to bear arms: Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.

No, don't try to pin this on us. The people who are creating all of the trouble, happen to be 4 women. No one has made any remarks about them as it relates to them being women....I certainly haven't. Nor, have I made any remark about their race, whatever race that might be. I'm not even sure if I know the races of these 4 women, nor do I really care. I am focused on their politics, that's all.

Going directly to the source, should mean going to the source of Americans she represents. Anything else is just stirring up crap. What American Jews has she spoken to?

You mean this isn't about race? I thought you told us it was all about race. Now you are telling us it is because they are women.

1. Read. 2. Talk to Jews 3. Talk to Palestinians She does not need to waste money going to Israel to just stir up crap. That is all she intends to do. We have these things called telephones and internet. There are plenty of American Jews and American Arabs she can talk to. Let's not forget, she is supposed to be representing AMERICANS!

SEND HER BACK! .................. SEND HER BACK! ....................SEND HER BACK! ..................SEND HER BACK! ..................SEND HER BACK! .................. SEND HER BACK! ....................SEND HER BACK! .................. SEND HER BACK!

Professors at Yale and Harvard may know how to run debates. But, TV Producers know (well some hopefully know) how to get ratings. When you are playing in someone else's sandbox, then you play by their rules and service their agenda. I am sure that the candidates would be welcome to do a debate in Harvard's Widener Library. Why don't you see if any of your candidates are interested in that?

Yes, I am familiar with the AA-12. It makes a nice lead-hose. Very few transferable AA-12's out there.

Unfortunately, Socialists do not know how to save and invest money. All they know how to do is re-distribute and waste money.

I hate you! This is just freaking bad-ass!!!

You learn how not to go through too much ammo. Also, Wolf steel-cased ammo is cheap and works. It might wear out a barrel in 10K rounds, but who cares, new barrels are relatively cheap.

Mine too. Unfortunately, Liberals are cheap bastards. If you have followed the thread where David R. claimed to be selling this website, you would have witnessed this first hand! I'd like to see a rich Conservative purchase CNN and turn it into what it was always supposed to be - a NEWS network. Just the news, nothing but the news and no political commentary.

As it stands now, the cheapest machine-guns available, mainly open-bolt MAC 10;s sell for over $7,000, and they prices go up every year as no more are being made. Most people today could not afford to own a machine gun, and this is fundamentally unfair in my opinion. Even though I already legally own a machine gun, I think all law abiding Americans should have the ability to own one. If the Hughes Amendment is repealed, prices would plummet to where they would once again be within reach of most people that really wanted one. So, I am willing to sacrifice over $10,000 in value just to allow others to own them too.

CNN watched how NBC royally screwed up the Democrat Debates they hosted, and CNN is scared to death of making the huge mistakes that NBC made. CNN thought they were safe when AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson stated that the company was "committed to continuing the editorial independence of CNN", after acquiring WarnerMedia. But, we all know that Stephenson was just saying this to get the damn deal done. CNN is a failing network owned by AT&T's WarnerMedia since only 2018. AT&T purchased WarnerMedia for a "steal" because of WarnerMedia's legacy flops, one of which was CNN. Since then, AT&T has been selling WarnerMedia assets that became its properties after it purchased the media giant for $85 billion. AT&T already sold WarnerMedia’s 10% stake in Hulu for $1.4 billion. It’s now in the process of selling WarnerMedia’s real estate property in New York. Soooooooo, what do you think AT&T plans to do with little old CNN? WarnerMedia's predecessors were not so money conscious when it came to CNN, but I can assure you that big daddy AT&T (even Stephenson), who's debt ballooned to $180 billion when it closed on the purchase of WarnerMedia, isn't going to stand for a loser CNN network F-ing up their bottom line for very long. And, CNN knows it!

CNN watched how NBC royally screwed up the Democrat Debates they hosted, and CNN is scared to death of making the huge mistakes that NBC made. CNN thought they were safe when AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson stated that the company was "committed to continuing the editorial independence of CNN. But, we all know that Stephenson was just saying this to get the damn deal done. CNN is a failing network owned by AT&T's WarnerMedia since only 2018. AT&T purchased WarnerMedia for a "steal" because of WarnerMedia's legacy flops, one of which was CNN. Since then, AT&T has been selling WarnerMedia assets that became its properties after it purchased the media giant for $85 billion. AT&T already sold WarnerMedia’s 10% stake in Hulu for $1.4 billion. It’s now in the process of selling WarnerMedia’s real estate property in New York. Soooooooo, what do you think AT&T plans to do with little old CNN? WarnerMedia's predecessors were not so money conscious, but I can assure you that as AT&T (even Stephenson), who's ballooned to $180 billion when it closed on the purchase of WarnerMedia, isn't going to stand for a loser CNN network F-ing up their bottom line for very long. And, CNN knows it!

The transfer of registered machine guns involves an extensive background check by the FBI, notification of the chief law enforcement officer in the purchaser's county, filling out a finger-print card and submitting it to BATFE, submitting a passport photograph to BATFE, payment of a $200 stamp tax, payment of a Class III dealer transfer fee and a minimum 6-month wait time. You do know that we can own registered machine guns, just that they needed to have been manufactured prior to 1986. All the repeal of the Hughes Amendment would do is allow people to own safer, newer machine guns under the same restrictive transfer laws.

1. To stir up trouble for the US and Israel. 2. To receive graft and kick-backs from Iran / Hamas 3. Free trip using tax-payer funds.

I would lose about $10,000 if Trump repeals the Hughs Amendment. But, it would be worth it for me to know that All Americans could again have access to newly manufactured registered machine guns.

Jews are kind of a race. True, they are a religion and not a pure race so to speak, but millennia of isolation in Europe, Northern Africa and the Middle East has made them into something of a race or several races, sort of.