teacher

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury." We are screwed. It's gonna happen one day. Maybe. 2020? Eh, not yet. But we keep spawning these entitled millennial fu(ks. Sooner or later these types are gonna tip the scales, but we have hope. We have the free flow of information. The race is on. The left is busy indoctrinating our youths. Have been. They wouldn't stand a chance if they hadn't. You don't see the right calling for first amendment free zones. What kind of participants in a free society calls for those that are again them to be outlawed? Dissent is not tolerated? Imagine if I ran this site with that mindset.

Someone has to throw the tea into the harbor.

This works... https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/251658-colorado-sheriff-is-willing-to-go-to-jail-rather-than-enforce-a-proposed-gun-law/?do=findComment&comment=1061022935

I doubt that. Without knowing anything about this I wager that the bill targets folks that are "accused" of being a threat to themselves or others. Due process has not been executed. Here's the deal: Folks like you desire that the means of the public to protect themselves from a Mother government grown tyrannical should be eradicated. You, Mr. Voke, want Mother government to hold ultimate authority. Folks like you are promising voters some of the earnings of others if they vote lefty. Those of us that earn have a problem with that. You shall never be able to justify why I should give up my earnings to a lazy fu(k. This matters not. What matters is that fu(ks like you can convince enough voters that they do indeed get to take from my pocket. By I have the 2nd amendment. And there's fu(ks like you's problem. See, moron, this is very simple. When fu(ks like you have the House, the Senate and the White house, the very first thing you need to work on is amending outta The Mighty US of A Constitution the 2nd amendment, THEN you can work on the first, then you can make stuff like climate change denying a crime like you fu(ks want. Do you really think we ain't onto your cheap, long term ploy? - Still remains that if you ever do get your way and you find a guy willing to come take my gun, with a gun (and they say irony can't be explained) I'm still gonna take your guy's gun away from him and stuff it up is azz. Then I'm gonna pull it outta is azz and come stuff the same gun up your azz. - Until the day comes that YOU are willing to come, by force, take my rights away, personally, AND win, you are all hollow bluster. Fu(k off.

This works... https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/251838-should-we-abolish-the-electoral-college/?do=findComment&comment=1061022921

Then two(2) wolves and a sheep could vote for what's for lunch. Then two(2) KKK guys and a black dude could vote on what to do with a length of rope. Then two(2) poor guys and a rich guy could vote on who pays for lunch. We have what is called a "Representative Republic." That means that three gentlemen get to vote on who is gonna determine who is gonna pay for lunch. The Founding Father's intended/thought this would be enough to separate the unwashed masses from the public largesse. One of the few times they failed. So now the game is for those that run for power promise some that they shall give those that vote for them the earnings of those that earn. Wala, American politics.

I'm playing their game. Turn about is fair play. That is mildly interesting. Got a non right link? But then it stands to reason that a lefty wants to pull US funding to a nation that stands between Putin and Europe. Cause lefties want communism to rule. Of course they don't, he's handsy. Thought you didn't care about that?

No.

No.

I'm sorry, Sir, I did. Turns out I am this guy... I'm a tad OCD when it comes to thread titles.

That's all well and nice. Are you willing to shoot fellow Americans cause you disagree with their vote?

I posted that before this latest kerfuffle. On top of it, always. - teacher It's like I can see the future. - I can. There's a whole thing here. Eh, just standard teacher horse thread fodder.

I can't stands it. I'm correcting the spelling of this thread's title, used to read... Should we abolish the electoeal college? Now it doesn't. I'm petty like that. I have ruled.

This question stands.

So you are saying (if what you contend is even true) that wealth generation should be the predominating factor for whos vote counts?